For beginners, the 2nd Amendment is part of the United States Constitution, the Law of this Land.
Therefore, contrary to what Ms. Lane has said here, the 2nd Amendment is not, cannot, be the property or possession of President Trump.
Second, the Second Amendment was inserted into the US Constitution by the Founding Fathers of this country, as a measure, a safeguard, to protect the individual citizen from the government’s natural tendency to encroach and invade.
Third, the 2nd Amendment itself cannot have contributed to the killing of people by other people armed with firearms.
The killing of one person of another with a firearm is if the intention is to destroy a human life for the mere sake of doing destruction – an act of murder which every single law in all of our statutes prohibits and seeks to punish with the Death Penalty which is neither cruel nor unusual.
Next, Ms. Lane here fails to demonstrate that there is ample evidence available to those of us who support the validity and usefulness of the Second Amendment.
In her conveniently omitting all such evidence in favor of private ownership of firearms, she forfeits all credibility as an intellectually dishonest person.
Moreover, she weakens her own argument in blasting the Second Amendment for her argument in arguing for one side exclusively exposes it as fragile and easy to overcome by defenders of the citizen’s right to bear arms.
Thus, it’s easy to conclude that a beautiful face is no evidence of a sound mind.